The 2010 Value EquationĪll things are never equal, and it's hard to quantify the value of Geekbench numbers for the 15" and 17" MacBook Pros are the same.
Retails at $200 less than last year's 2.8 GHz model, while the $2,499Ģ.66 GHz i7 machine is $300 less than last year's 3.06 GHz model. With a $2,299 price, the 2.53 GHz i5 model
Used 2010 macbook pro pro#
Models with GeForce 9600 graphics, prices are $200, $300, and $400 lessĮxcept for being bigger and heavier and having a larger display,Įverything said about the 15" MacBook Pro applies equally to the 17" model, but The entry-level model retails for $1,799, the midrange for $1,999,Īnd the top-end, with its i7 CPU, for $2,199. We await results from Macworld and others.Īpple has introduced a 1680 x 1050 high resolution display optionįor an extra $100, giving it almost as much resolution as the 17" with Which is more powerful than the GeForce 9600 found in last year's 15"įeats benchmarked it at 20.8% better using the Cinebench 11.5 Then there's the new Nvidia GeForce 330M 48-core graphics processor, Pretty close to the "up to 50%" more power that Apple claims. The 2.66 GHz models find the i7 providing 45.8% more horsepower. Comparing the 2.53 GHz models, the i5 is 40% more powerful, and Year's top-end machine and 34.6% more than last year's entry-level The slowest i5 MacBook Pro has 15% more processing power than last The i5 and i7 to dynamically change clock speed shows using Primate While the 2009 model had aįaster rated clock speed for its Core 2 Duo (C2D) CPU, the ability of Each of the two cores can run at a 25% higher clock speed as The rated speeds of 2.4, 2.53, and 2.66 GHz are just a starting point -Ī minimum. To "overclock" itself (Intel calls this Turbo Boost), which means that
Used 2010 macbook pro mac#
Nehalem technology the powers the Mac Pro and iMac. The Intel i5 and i7 CPUs found in the 15" MBP use the same Prices remain the same as last year's models. The new Nvidia GPUs are also more energy efficient, which Intel i5 and i7 CPUs, so I haven't yet seen any benchmark results for Unfortunately,Įveryone seems intent on benchmarking the 15" and 17" models with their GeForce 9400M found in the original 13" MacBook Pro. Nvidia claims it's up to 80% more powerful than the The biggest change here is the new Nvidia GeForce 320M 48-core (clock speed alone predicts 6.2%) and 5.0% at the top end (clock speed That's an 8.0% performance boost at the low end Last year's 2.26 GHz scored 3137, while theĢ.53 GHz rated 3561. Primate Labs reports overall scores of 3390 for the 2.4 GHz modelĪnd 3739 for the 2.66 GHz. On average, that'sĪbout 5% faster than last year's model. GHz, while the top-end model is rated at 2.66 GHz. The entry-level model runs its CPU at 2.4 MacBook Pro is the least changed - and the only one to still use
Since the batteries can't be easily removed and replaced, this Wireless productivity, while the 15" and 17" models are rated at up toĩ hours. The new 13" MacBook Pro (MBP) is rated at 10 hours of Perhaps the most important is that Apple has squeezed out even moreīattery life. Models look the same as the models they replace and have the same sizeĪnd weight, but under the hood, there are quite a few differences. Lain SCSI Thunderbolt Unsupported Sierra USB 1.1 USB 2.0Īpple overhauled the MacBook Pro line last week.
Used 2010 macbook pro mac os x#
802.11g 802.11n 68030 68040 Apple April Fools clamshell iBook Classic Mac OS FireWire FireWire 400 G3 humor iBook iMac iMac G3 Intel iOS iPad iPhone LaserWriter Linux Mac MacBook Air Mac clones Mac mini Mac OS 9 macOS Sierra Mac OS X Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard Microsoft OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard OS X 10.7 Lion OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion OS X 10.9 Mavericks OS X 10.10 Yosemite OS X 10.11 El Capitan PowerBook PowerPC Rodney O.
0 kommentar(er)
